Open Letter to City Council: Pending Council Reorganization

Mayor and Council:

I write to express my support for those of you who may be motivated to replace the current vice mayor and the members of the Personnel Committee. I have heard a number of voices in the community who share my desire for a vice mayor interested in playing for “Team Portsmouth” rather than “Team Me/Myself/and I”. Regarding the Personnel Committee, I believe the public would be better served by people not pursuing the goal of remaking our boards and commissions in their own images but in reflecting the community as a whole with its diversity of demographic characteristics and perspectives. Additionally, I have seen convincing evidence that the current Personnel Committee has treated a number of commissioners/board members who were eligible, qualified, and willing to accept reappointment inequitably by not offering them subsequent terms. The people who donate their time and talents to our city deserve our thanks, not indifference or antagonism from the selection committee. If reappointment is an option within the defined term limits, and an incumbent has been attending meetings and performing other required duties conscientiously, he/she/they should be reappointed as a matter of course.

Please make your selections Tuesday [January 3, 2023] with those precepts in mind.

Yours truly,
Mark Geduldig-Yatrofsky

Recall Improvements That Aren’t

DISCLAIMER: As non-lawyers embarking on a discussion of legal matters, we declare that the following descriptions and analysis rest on a lay person’s understanding of the referenced documents, namely the Portsmouth City Charter, Section 12.09, and the proposed language found in Appendix A of the resolution linked to City Council Agenda Item 22-375 and are not intended as legal guidance.

For the second time in as many years, Portsmouth City Council will consider changes to city charter provisions pertaining to the recall (i. e., process for removing) of local elected officials. In a republic, theoretically, no office to which people are elected is the exclusive property of its current occupant, so depending on the term established by law for a particular position, whoever is sitting in the seat will be subject to replacement in a subsequent election. Sometimes, though, an official does such a poor job of representing her/his/their constituency that removal before the end of term becomes an imperative. Recall provides that kind of political safety valve. Continue reading

Guest Opinion: Open Letter to Council on City Manager Selection

Dear Mayor Glover and Members of Council,

Many of us who who watched last week’s city council meeting were distressed to have witnessed what transpired: a person with no governmental management experience, no postsecondary education, and who had never shown interest publicly in the job, was proposed for appointment as our new city manager! How do we list the number of reasons we oppose Mr. Meeks for the position and reject the way Council handled this?  We wrote to each of you before last week’s meeting, outlining some of the myriad problems with his appointment. But then to see council members move forward nonetheless and all but hire this individual, totally ignoring the multitude of applications for the job already received AND the detailed published job requirements AND the fact that this person is singularly unqualified to run the city was very disturbing. How could council justify ignoring the many legitimate applicants who had shown interest and capabilities?  How could council simply refuse to honor their contractual arrangement with the consultants paid by Portsmouth citizens to assure precisely what you wanted to eliminate: an open and transparent process for hiring the best individual for the highest position in the city government? Continue reading

Coming Together on the Right Path

Updated January 13, 2021. A majority of council, Members Barnes, Battle, Moody, and Woodard, voted to appoint Danny Meeks City Manager. They went into closed meeting to consider a compensation package but, on emerging into public session, voted to reconsider the previous vote. Rather than sustaining the prior appointment, they voted to extend the candidate search until January 20. (For additional details, see Portsmouth City Council voted to hire Danny Meeks as city manager. He still needs to apply for the job. – Daily Press.)

If the rumors that began circulating on social media last Friday are true, a coalition of disgruntled council members and their junior partners may have stumbled onto a way to bridge the racial political divide that has plagued our city for decades. Unfortunately, hard evidence of what, if confirmed, would be a real conspiracy has not yet surfaced. Consequently, as a responsible voice of the community, PortsmouthCityWatch.org will address this as a hypothetical situation rather than a matter of established fact. Continue reading